Christmas thoughts…

[Pipeman]

From December 9, 2004:

"Christmas with the Kranks" is not only the name of a holiday movie this year, it is also a national trend. Once again, Christmas is under siege by the growing forces of secularism in America. Put these facts in your stocking:

• Federated Department Stores, which includes Macy's, has suggested that managers avoid displaying "Merry Christmas" banners and have ordered employees not to talk about it.
• In Denver, a church was banned from the "Festival of Lights" parade because it wanted a religious theme to its float.
• The Maplewood, New Jersey school board has banned all religious music from "holiday" concerts. (Would somebody please tell me exactly what holiday this is?)
• And New York City Mayor Bloomberg insists that the lighted tree outside City Hall is not a Christmas tree, it's a "holiday tree." (What holiday, Mr. Mayor?)

Surveys show that more than 90% of Americans celebrate the Federal holiday of Christmas, signed into law by President Grant in 1870. Despite that overwhelming number, the tradition of Christmas in America continues to get hammered.

The anti-Christmas forces say it's all about diversity, protecting the sensitivities of those Americans who get offended by the mere mention of the birth of Jesus. Somehow, I haven't been able to locate any of these people--folks who find a baby in a manger so off-putting, it ruins their day.

So the diversity excuse is a bunch of bull. What's really going on here is a well-organized movement to wipe out any display of organized religion from the public arena.

The secular-progressive movement understands very well that it is organized religion, most specifically Christianity and Judaism, that stands in the way of gay marriage, partial birth abortion, legalized narcotics, euthanasia, and many other secular causes. If religion can be de-emphasized in the USA, a brave new progressive society can be achieved.

It has happened in Canada. Once a traditional religious country, Canada has become like Holland in its embrace of the secular movement. Some facts: In 1980, 79% of Canadians said that religion was important to the country. That number has now fallen to 61%, according to an Environics Focus Canada poll.

In 1971, less than one percent of the Canadian population reported having no religion whatsoever; now that number has risen to 16%. 

The fall of religion in Canada has corresponded to a change in public policy. Unlike Americans, Canadians have legalized gay marriage and any kind of abortion. Also, the age of consent for sex up north is just 14 years old. Can you imagine American adults being allowed to fool around with children that age? I can't.

Even drug legalization is close to being a reality, as the city of Vancouver is developing a heroin give-away policy, and pot has been largely decriminalized across the country.

The Canadian model is what progressive Americans are shooting for, and so religion must be dealt with. Since Christmas is the most demonstrative display of organized religion, the strategy of minimizing the birth of Jesus makes perfect sense.

I know this sounds kind of conspiratorial, but it really isn't. Most of those marginalizing Christmas have no idea about the big picture I've just presented. They simply think they're looking out for the minority of Americans who don't celebrate the birth of Christ.

But committed secularists in the media, in the courts, and in the education system know exactly what's going on. And now so do you. Merry Christmas!

Bill O’Reilly 

[PISTON LAKE CRUISER]

All of Mr O'Reilly's facts are not totally correct. Here is an exert from a Canadian Department of Justice publication regarding age of consent for sex:

Age of Consent to Sexual Activity

Consent to sexual activity

Canada's age of consent

The age of consent to sexual activity is 16 years. In some cases, the age of consent is higher (for example, when there is a relationship of trust, authority or dependency).

In other words, a person must be at least 16 years old to be able to legally agree to sexual activity.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 There is an exception regarding age of consenting partner however the above is the general rule.   

             

 

[Pipeman]

9 hours ago, PISTON LAKE CRUISER said:

All of Mr O'Reilly's facts are not totally correct. Here is an exert from a Canadian Department of Justice publication regarding age of consent for sex:

Age of Consent to Sexual Activity

Consent to sexual activity

Canada's age of consent

The age of consent to sexual activity is 16 years. In some cases, the age of consent is higher (for example, when there is a relationship of trust, authority or dependency).

In other words, a person must be at least 16 years old to be able to legally agree to sexual activity.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 There is an exception regarding age of consenting partner however the above is the general rule.   

             

 

It was correct in 2004 when the article was written (which is dated at the very top of the article). You are correct it is now and has been since 2008 age 16. I wasn’t posting this for any other reason except  to raise thoughts on the progressive way of thinking. 

[iceman]

Free Heroin

what could go wrong?

[jak]

Always liked O'Reilly, conservative but not a right wing nut. Could get his point across without sounding angry or calling people names. He didn't / wouldn't drink the cool aid.